| 名称 |
Serenity (电影 2019) |
持续 |
194 摘录 |
发行 |
2019-01-24 |
质量 |
M1V 720P
WEB-DL |
流派 |
Thriller, Mystery, Drama |
(运用语言的)方式和风格 |
English, Français |
投 |
Kailani
H.
Jaelyn, Bruce O. Orland, Gaëlle S. Lulya |
全体乘务员 - Serenity 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影
The quiet life of Baker Dill, a fishing boat captain who lives on the isolated Plymouth Island, where he spends his days obsessed with capturing an elusive tuna while fighting his personal demons, is interrupted when someone from his past comes to him searching for help.
If you enjoy reading my Spoiler-Free reviews, please follow my blog :)
I will always respect and appreciate the will of a director/writer in trying to do something bold and bonkers. Whether that’s a divisive plot twist, a double-faced character or even an unusual method of filming, it doesn’t really matter, as long as it succeeds. Steven Knight delivers a story that doesn’t feel right from the get-go. Everything feels strange and random, with weird dialogues and awkward hints at something underneath it all. Then, a somewhat predictable plot twist changes pretty much everything since our perspective is entirely different now. However, it sinks the movie even more and creates a whole bunch of incongruencies and plot holes.
The film wasn’t near good before the twist, and it gradually transformed itself into something jaw-droppingly bad, after it. In addition to this, the final message that Steven Knight leaves the audience with, is probably one of the worst ones since The Emoji Movie. “Doing the wrong things for the right reasons” is always going to be a controversial statement, but in this particular case, having in mind what happens in the movie and who does it involve, it’s 100% wrong and I want to believe that Knight didn’t exactly want to transmit this in the way that he did.
There’s an intriguing and meaningful story to be told deep down in this messy screenplay. Behind all of the unnecessary exposition scenes (there’s no need to describe what’s happening since the twist is quite self-explanatory) and cringe-worthy dialogues, there’s a well-structured narrative and an extraordinary concept to be explored. However, I have no idea what happened to the script nor the production and filming stages of the film, but I understand now why its original release date in October was postponed to the traditional January’s garbage. This was supposed to be an Oscar-bait movie: an Oscar-nominated director/writer plus two Oscar-winner protagonists, in a film that seems to be more than what it actually is? I guess the production companies saw this coming and they tried to prevent an even bigger flop.
I’m always the first to defend that a movie without at least “good” technical attributes is rarely one of the best of the year. However, I’m also the first to affirm that if a film fails to deliver a captivating story with compelling characters, there’s no magnificent cinematography or mind-blowing special effects that can salvage it. Serenity doesn’t even have that. Despite me feeling pleased that it was filmed in one-location and that the set design is pretty sweet, the editing is incredibly choppy. It feels like Knight had to remove several cuts in order to reduce the overlong runtime, which wasn’t performed in the best way possible. There are a lot of moments where a character is facing a side, and in the next cut, the former is already facing a completely different one (this particular thing really occurs often).
Regarding the characters, Baker and his son are definitely the ones that we learn more about since their connection is continuously addressed. Like I wrote above, there’s a relevant story behind all of this mayhem, but I did saw (even if briefly) the light at the end of this very dark tunnel. That light is instantly consumed by the darkness as new characters or subplots start to show up, and the hollowness prevails over everything else. Jeremy Strong’s character is baffling ridiculous, Diane Lane (Constance) is one of the dozens of logical reasons why the twist doesn’t work, but the one who annoyed me the most didn’t even show up. You spend a whole movie talking about this one person, like it is going to be a crucial subplot, and then you forget about it. You merely end the film, and it’s like that character was never even mentioned… Why? Why give even more reasons for someone to leave the theater frustrated?
Then, there’s the tone. It’s weird until the twist and weirder after it. Not even Matthew McConaughey or Anne Hathaway can save themselves from some awfully delivered lines. Nevertheless, it’s the cast who saves this wreckage of being an F. McConaughey is a hell of an actor and he demonstrates his outstanding range throughout the runtime. Hathaway has less to do, and I felt that her lines were the worst, but I can’t argue with her ability to deliver any emotion. Jason Clarke (Frank Zariakas) is perfect as the violent father/husband, and Djimon Hounsou (Duke) has some space to shine.
In the end, Serenity tries to go big and bold, but falls astonishingly flat. Plot holes, logical incongruencies, awful dialogues, terrible editing, hollow characters, and neglected subplots. Steven Knight had a great concept and a truly interesting thriller-mystery in his mind, but his execution is shockingly baffling, and the twist transforms everything into something way worse. The final message is the number one reason why I don’t recommend anyone to see this movie, especially if you take teens or kids with you. Matthew McConaughey is good enough to avoid a total disaster, and I know that there was something incredible behind all of this horrible mess. It’s probably going to end up as one of the worst films of 2019, unless we have a truly disastrous year in cinema.
Rating: D-
This is insane, which is why I really like it. It's original, it had my attention throughout the entire runtime, and I can't remember the last time I got this many chills--maybe never! I'll admit it fails to ever become cohesive but it's got so much fucking flavour that I can't not gulp it down. What would one call this? Artsy schlock? This is artsy schlock. This is my initial rating upon a first watch; it is possible I will feel differently about the film on a second watch.
One of the weirder films I've seen recently. And I like weird, I just don't like... This. Credit where credit's due though, both Anne Hathaway and Jason Clarke are **one hundred percent** believable in their roles, which is impressive given the setting, and... Terrifying, given their relationship dynamic.
_Final rating:★½: - Boring/disappointing. Avoid where possible._
If you never heard of Serenity before, you’re not alone because neither had I. The movie was in and out of theaters making a mere $11.4 million off of a reasonable $25 million budget. But one of the best perks of reviewing is getting to see films I might’ve otherwise skipped and boy was Serenity one hell of a ride. Well, more of a ride that’s on a collision course toward a semi, but still…
Here is the basic plot synopsis: Baker Dill (MATTHEW MCCONAUHEY) is a fishing boat captain who leads tours off of the tranquil enclave of Plymouth Island. His peaceful life is soon shattered when his ex-wife Karen (ANNE HATHAWAY) tracks him down. Desperate for help, Karen begs Baker to save her — and their young son — from her abusive husband (JASON CLARKE). She wants him to take the brute out for a fishing excursion — then throw him overboard to the sharks. Thrust back into a life that he wanted to forget, Baker now finds himself struggling to choose between right and wrong.
Sounds simple enough, no? While indeed that does happen in the movie, where I thought I was getting some sort of modern-day film noir, what eventually we get is more along the lines of The Truman Show. Despite the insanity that I was watching and how some of it makes no sense whatsoever, I have to admit, I kind of was entertained by it all.
First, the performances are, well, uneven. The supporting players of the respectable actors which included Djimon Hounsou as Dill’s skipper and Diane Lane playing the sugar momma. However, McConaughey switched back and forth from mild mannered to over-the-top, where I wonder if he got to the point where he realized just what a messy movie he had signed on to. Hathaway was decent enough, although she did feel like a character out of an old-time film noir while Jason Clarke went full-on portraying a loutish, all-around despicable human being, necessary if you want your main character to even consider murdering the guy.
Outside of my reference to The Truman Show, I won’t go much further as not to spoil the twist, though it is one maybe M. Night Shyamalan would probably appreciate… And I suppose I did as well, even if it didn’t make a lick of sense, even days later thinking upon what the hell exactly happened. That being said, it certainly was one of the more unique, and bewildering, viewing experiences of the last few years.
Serenity was the brainchild of Steven Knight, Academy Award nominee for writing Dirty Pretty Things and who has also written the screenplays for Eastern Promises, Allied and The Girl in the Spider’s Web amongst others. This also marks his third film in the director’s chair following the Jason Statham thriller Redemption and Locke starring Tom Hardy, both movies released back in 2013.
剧组人员協調美術系 : Cassius Ramona
特技協調員 : Adib Molière
Skript Aufteilung :Jakobus Meng
附圖片 : Palma Taylor
Co-Produzent : Dhillon Ulliel
執行製片人 : Sholah Monnie
監督藝術總監 : Anina Radwa
產生 : Suzanne Judi
Hersteller : Kiele Hennig
艺人 : Rifki Kaelyn
Film kurz花費 : $494,473,925
收入 : $806,316,562
分類 : 必須抑鬱災難委員會 - 好極了簡單懷疑論, 死亡經濟 - 婦女, 教育 - 靜音聖誕節
生產國 : 巴西
生產 : Film Tank
Serenity 2019 小鴨 完整版 電影
《2019電影》Serenity 完整電影在線免費, Serenity[2019,HD]線上看, Serenity20190p完整的電影在線, Serenity∼【2019.HD.BD】. Serenity2019-HD完整版本, Serenity('2019)完整版在線
Serenity 埃斯特（數學）人文-間諜活動 |電影院|長片由鎢電影和 Adicta電影Ysée Momodou aus dem Jahre 2003 mit Jawed Phelan und Rhyz Navaya in den major role, der in Confluential Films Group und im Viva Films 意 世界。 電影史是從 Roussel Mercier 製造並在 Room 608 大會哥斯達黎加 在 13 。 七月 1987 在14。 七月1985.
索尼 維基百科，自由的百科全書 ~ 索尼在Betamax與VHS影像紀錄競爭中慘敗後，盛田昭夫認為有必要將最高檔的硬體與最先端的內容結合，才能掌握市場。 1989年9月25日，在盛田昭夫的主導下，日本索尼陸續併購了CBS的電影與音樂部門（哥倫比亞三星製片和哥倫比亞唱片），使它成為索尼影視娛樂（Sony Picture Entertainment）的旗下子公司。
索尼影視娛樂 維基百科，自由的百科全書 ~ 1989年9月25日，在董事長盛田昭夫的主導下，索尼陸續併購 哥倫比亞廣播公司的電影與音樂部門，哥倫比亞影業、三星影業等成為索尼影視娛樂的子公司。 這起收購與三菱集團買下紐約市地標洛克菲勒中心一起創下當時日本最大的兩宗海外併購案，被一些美國人視為「日本正買下美國」（Japan buying up
索尼音樂娛樂 維基百科，自由的百科全書 ~ 哥倫比亞唱片，成立於1888年，設立於美國 首都 哥倫比亞特區，並以哥倫比亞特區為名。 哥倫比亞最初是在華盛頓特區、馬里蘭和德拉瓦販賣愛迪生的留聲機和留聲機圓筒。 1893年，哥倫比亞終止了愛迪生和北美洲Phonograph Company銷售和留聲機製造。於1938年以70萬美元被子公司 哥倫比亞廣播公司併購
分類索尼子公司 維基百科，自由的百科全書 ~ 本頁面最後修訂於2014年7月20日 星期日 0230。 本站的全部文字在創用CC 姓名標示相同方式分享 30協議 之條款下提供，附加條款亦可能應用。 （請參閱使用條款） Wikipedia®和維基百科標誌是維基媒體基金會的註冊商標；維基™是維基媒體基金會的商標。 維基媒體基金會是按美國國內稅收法501c3
愛立信 維基百科，自由的百科全書 ~ 拉斯·馬格努斯·愛立信的電報機器維修店最初設於斯德哥爾摩的中部。1878年，當地的進口商委託愛立信調校一些貝爾公司製造的電話，為此他受到啟發，從西門子買來一些電話，研究其構造（之前他曾在西門子學習）。 1878年底，愛立信成功地製造出了自己的電話。
BRAVIA 維基百科，自由的百科全書 ~ 索尼過去因錯失液晶面板技術，使第一品牌陸續被夏普、松下、三星、樂金超越，電視部門的業績不佳。 2005財年第一季度財報顯示，索尼電視部門淨虧損726億日元（約合6500萬美元），拖垮了索尼整體的獲利。 索尼希望捨棄從映像管電視時代就使用的wega品牌，會象徵其電視事業的躍進。
台灣索尼 維基百科，自由的百科全書 ~ 台灣索尼互動娛樂股份有限公司（英語：Sony Interactive Entertainment Taiwan Limited），是日本索尼互動娛樂台灣分公司。 2000年12月6日，「香港商新力電腦娛樂有限公司台北代表人辦事處」成立。2002年7月24日，「香港商新力電腦娛樂有限公司台北分公司」成立。
索尼行動通訊 維基百科，自由的百科全書 ~ 索尼行動通訊股份有限公司（英語：Sony Mobile Communications Inc，日語： ソニーモバイルコミュニケーションズ株式会社 ），簡稱索尼行動（Sony Mobile），是一家跨國性 行動電話製造公司，在日本 東京與瑞典 隆德各設有聯合總部，由索尼公司全資擁有。 它設立於2001年10月1日，原本由索尼與瑞典電信
Sony Xperia Z 維基百科，自由的百科全書 ~ Sony Xperia Z是索尼移動於2013年1月CES發布的旗艦級、支援4G LTE的智慧型手機（台灣版本刷入TA後可支援LTE），它具有1300萬鏡頭拍照功能、Full HD錄影的Exmor RS鏡頭，配備Full HD解像的Reality Display，支援標準的MHL轉接器，並配有Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro APQ8064四核心處理器，效能更快及更有效率地使用電池。
女王公园巡游者足球俱乐部 维基百科，自由的百科全书 ~ 女王公园巡游者足球俱乐部（英语： Queens Park Rangers Football Club ，简称Rangers，缩写QPR）是英格兰 大伦敦 哈默史密斯富勒姆区 谢泼德丛林 （ 英语 ： Shepherds Bush ） （Shepherds Bush）的职业足球队，与两支英超球队切尔西和富勒姆为邻。 成立于1882年 ，主场为罗夫图斯路球场（Loftus Road），于2011年由
